Belated Oscar Thoughts

Sunday, February 24, 2008, was the day that I looked forward to all year long. My World Series. My Super Bowl. My World Cup. My Daytona 500. It was: the Oscars. I got into the spirit of things early in the day. I took my People Magazine to Jittery Joes and devoured my celebrity smut. I parked myself on the couch promptly at 6 PM so that I could flip back and forth between E! and TV Guide Network (to minimize commercials) so that I could see the Red Carpet coverage, trying desperately to hear over Livers' screams, cries, and yells. And though most Americans disagreed with me as to how wonderful this year's award show was (the lowest ratings in years), I thoroughly enjoyed myself. I am not a fair weather fan. I was in for the long haul....all 3 1/2 hours plus of it.

What made the Oscars more enjoyable for me this year than in years past was that for the first time I had actually seen all of the films nominated for Best Picture (and many of the other films that actors were nominated for). I felt like I could actually form a valid opinion of the quality of movies and credibility of acting abilities this year. On this note, I will give my opinions of the major categories this year.

BEST PICTURE: This for me is kind of tough. I liked each of these movies and I understand why the critics did, too. No Country for Old Men is a good movie and I understand why it won its award. However, I personally would have chosen Juno instead. The movie is precious on so many levels. It is witty. The characters are deep and well-portrayed. The music was spectacular. It had everything I wanted in a movie, which is why, after watching over a dozen films this year, it remains my favorite movie (and I suspect might be at year's end). I also really loved Atonement. Maybe it's the hopeless romantic that still dwells within, but I felt like crying when I thought of this movie for DAYS after watching it. It really stuck with me.

BEST ACTOR: I only saw Daniel Day-Lewis, Viggo Mortensen, and George Clooney, and based on these I would have to say the winner was properly chosen. DDL was great and scary, and will drink your milkshake.

BEST ACTRESS: Only saw Ellen Page and Julie Christie. Would have chosen Page, because Christie's role got on my nerves (must not have a soft spot for Alzheimer's patients) because I couldn't tell if she was faking it to piss off a husband who cheated on her years ago. The Academy does love their portrayals of real-life people, so it's no shocker that Cotillard won.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: I think they got it with Javier Bardem. He was one scary brother pucker in No Country. However, I did love Hal Holbrook's emotional performance in Into the Wild (which was strangely absent in the Best Picture race; I would've preferred it over There Will Be Blood).

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: Totally disagree with the Academy's choice here. Tilda Swinton did okay in this movie, but man, Amy Ryan's performance in Gone Baby Gone was gritty and depressingly good. And I somehow feel that Cate Blanchett's protrayal of Bob Dylan in I'm Not There probably would have been spectacular had I seen it. (I don't care enough for Dylan to watch five people be him for two hours.)